E-Cad、EGFR 和FOXA1 在三阴性乳腺癌中表达的临床意义
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

李玉军,E-mail :liyujun.66@168.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Clinical significance of E-Cad, EGFR and FOXA1 in triple-negative breast cancer
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 研究健康人群、三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)与非三阴性乳腺癌(NTNBC)患者血清中可溶 性E- 钙黏蛋白(E-Cad)、表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的表达和意义。方法 选取49 例三阴性乳腺癌患者(TNBC 组),198 例非三阴性乳腺癌患者(NTNBC 组)和50 例健康人群(非患者组)作为研究对象。采用酶联免疫吸 附试验检测血清中E-Cad 和EGFR 表达水平,免疫组织化学检测FOXA1 表达。采用ROC 曲线评价血清ECad 和EGFR 对乳腺癌或TNBC 的临床诊断价值,并以Youden 指数作为诊断试验的准确度评价指标,分别 预测血清中E-Cad 和EGFR 的诊断界值。结果 与非患者组比较,乳腺癌患者E-Cad、EGFR 和FOXA1 表达升 高(P <0.01)。与NTNBC 组比较,TNBC 组E-Cad 表达差异无统计学意义(P >0.05),而EGFR 表达升高 (P <0.01),且FOXA1 表达降低(P <0.01)。E-Cad 和EGFR 诊断乳腺癌的ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)分别 为0.965(95%CI :0.944,0.986),0.758(95%CI :0.686,0.830),当E-Cad 和EGFR 的界值分别为1 010.7 和 107.9 ng/ml 时,Youden 指数为0.807 和0.385,诊断乳腺癌的敏感性为92.7% 和78.5%,特异性为88.0% 和60%。 EGFR 诊断TNBC 的ROC 曲线下面积为0.776(95%CI :0.703,0.848),界值为139.5ng/ml 时,Youden 指数 为0.473,诊断TNBC 的敏感性为79.6%,特异性为67.7%。结论 FOXA1 可作为乳腺癌或TNBC 的辅助诊断 指标;血清E-Cad 和EGFR 检测可作为诊断乳腺癌的指标,且EGFR 可作为TNBC 的诊断指标。

    Abstract:

    Objectives To investigate the association of circulating E-cadherin (E-cad) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with pathological behavior of breast cancer. Methods Totally 49 patients diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC group),198 patients diagnosed with non-triple negative breast cancer (NTNBC group) and 50 healthy subjects were involved in this study. Concentration of E-Cad and EGFR were obtained by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the expression of FOXA1 was measured by immunohistochemistry. The clinical diagnostic value of serum E-cad and EGFR in breast cancer or TNBC was evaluated by ROC curve. The Youden index was utilized to evaluate the diagnostic threshold of E-cad and EGFR. Results Expression levels of E-Cad, EGFR and FOXA1 in breast cancer patients were significantly increased (P < 0.01) compared with healthy volunteers. No statistically significant difference in E-Cad was observed between TNBC group and NTNBC group (P > 0.05). Concentration of EGFR increased (P < 0.01) while FOXA1 decreased (P < 0.01) significantly in TNBC group when compared with NTNBC group. ROC curve showed that AUC of E-Cad and EGFR for breast cancer was 0.965 (95% CI: 0.944, 0.986) and 0.758 (95% CI: 0.686, 0.830), respectively. At the threshold of 1 010.7 ng/ml for E-Cad and 107.9 ng/ml EGFR, the Youden index was 0.807 and 0.385, sensitivity for diagnosis of breast cancer was 92.7% and 78.5%, and the specificity was 88.0% and 60%, respectively. AUC of EGFR for diagnosis of TNBC was 0.776 (95% CI: 0.703, 0.848). At the threshold of 139.5 ng/ml, the largest Youden index was 0.473, the sensitivity was 79.6%, and the specificity was 67.7%. Conclusion E-cad and EGFR can be used as indicators of diagnosis for breast cancer while FOXA1 and EGFR can be a diagnostic candidate for diagnosis of TNBC.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张言敏,孙辉,李玉军. E-Cad、EGFR 和FOXA1 在三阴性乳腺癌中表达的临床意义[J].中国现代医学杂志,2018,(9):50-54

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-02
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-03-31
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码