大剂量激素联合重组人血小板生成素与环孢素 治疗免疫性血小板减少症的疗效比较
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Clinical research of Glucocorticoid combined with recombinant human thrombopoietin or Cyclosporine A in treatment of primary immune thrombocytopenia
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨大剂量激素(GC)联合重组人血小板生成素(rhTPO)和大剂量激素联合环孢素(CsA) 两种方案治疗免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的有效性和安全性。方法 选取河南省漯河市中心医院48 例ITP 患者并随机分为GC+rhTPO 组和GC+CsA 组,每组24 例。两组初期均给予大剂量地塞米松治疗,4 d 后停药; GC+rhTPO 组同时皮下注射rhTPO,治疗14 d 或血小板计数(PLT)正常后减量为2 次/ 周;GC+CsA 组 同时给予环孢素静脉注射,治疗14 d 或PLT 正常后减量口服。比较两组患者治疗前、治疗第4、7、14、21 和28 天PLT 和起效时间,计算并比较显效率、有效率及不良反应发生情况。结果 不同时间点PLT 比较差 异有统计学意义(P <0.05),两组PLT 比较差异有统计学意义(P <0.05),GC+rhTPO 组PLT 高于GC+CsA 组,两组PLT 变化趋势差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);GC+rhTPO 组起效时间为(6.5±2.7)d,GC+CsA 组 起效时间为(9.5±4.5)d,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P <0.05),前者短于后者;GC+rhTPO 组显效率和 总有效率分别为41.7% 和91.7%,GC+CsA 组显效率和总有效率分别为12.5% 和79.2%,两组显效率比较差 异有统计学意义(P <0.05),前者高于后者,两组总有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05);治疗过程中 GC+rhTPO 组出现1 例不良反应,GC+CsA 组出现2 例不良反应,均可耐受。结论 相对联合CsA 治疗,大 剂量激素联合rhTPO 治疗ITP 起效更快、疗效更好,不良反应轻微,但两者均有临床应用价值。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of Glucocorticoid (GC) combined with recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) or Cyclosporine A (CsA) in the treatment of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Methods A total of 48 patients diagnosed with ITP were randomly divided into GC+rhTPO group and GC+CsA group. Both groups received intravenous treatment of GC for 4 days. GC+rhTPO group simultaneously received subcutaneous treatment of rhTPO while GC+CsA group received intravenous treatment of CsA. The platelet (PLT) level of the two groups before treatment and 4 days, 7 days, 14 days, 21 days and 28 days after treatment and the effect time were compared. The effective rate, efficancy and adverse reactions of the two groups were calculated and analyzed. Results The PLT levels were different at different points (P < 0.05). The PLT level were different between the GC+rhTPO group and GC+CsA group (P < 0.05). The platelet level of GC+rhTPO group was significantly higher than GC+CsA group (P < 0.05). There was statistically significant difference in variation trends of the two groups (P < 0.05). The effect time of GC+rhTPO group was early than that of GC+CsA group (P < 0.05). The significant effective rate of GC+rhTPO group was higher than that of GC+CsA group (P < 0.05), while the overall effective rates of two groups were not different (P > 0.05). There was 1 patient in GC+rhTPO group and 2 patients in GC+CsA group with side effects. Conclusions GC combined with rhTPO is a more effective treatment and has a faster onset than the treatment of GC combined with CsA.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李红菊.大剂量激素联合重组人血小板生成素与环孢素 治疗免疫性血小板减少症的疗效比较[J].中国现代医学杂志,2019,(1):103-107

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-28
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-01-15
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码