Abstract:Objective To explore the efficacy of laparoscopic recanalization and open surgery in the treatment of tubal obstruction infertility, and to provide reference for clinical. Methods From July 2015 to July 2018, 120 patients with tubal obstructive infertility who were treated in our hospital were selected as the research objects were divided into two groups according to the isometric random sampling method, 60 cases for per group. They were divided into two groups according to different treatment methods, each group had 60 cases. Patients in the control group were treated with open surgery, while those in the study group were treated with laparoscopic recanalization. The clinical indicators, tubal patency rate, complication rate and pregnancy rate were compared between the two groups. Results The operation time, recovery time of first exhaust after operation, intraoperative bleeding volume, VAS score of visual pain 2 hours after operation and hospitalization time in the study group were better than those in the control group (P?0.05); the tubal patency rate in the study group was 90.0%, which was higher than 63.3% in the control group (P?0.05), and the successful pregnancy rate in the study group was higher than that in the control group 1.5 years after the operation (P?0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic recanalization in the treatment of tubal obstructive infertility is significantly better than open surgery, with fewer complications, and can effectively improve the tubal recanalization rate and pregnancy rate.