Abstract:Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of surgical options and endovascular in treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysm. Methods A total of 102 patients with middle cerebral artery aneurysm were randomly divided into the surgical options group and the endovascular group, 51 cases in each group. The rate of complete occlusion, recurrence and complications, hospital length, hospital expense and postoperative recovery were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the rate of complete occlusion and recurrence rate between the surgical options group and endovascular group (P?>?0.05); the patients of the surgical options group had significantly higher rate of complications than the endovascular group (P?0.05); the hospital length in endovascular group were significantly shorter than those of the surgical options group, while the hospital expense in endovascular group were significantly higher than those of the surgical options group (P?0.05); the rate of postoperative recovery of the endovascular group was 88.2%, which was significantly better than that of the surgical options group (72.5%) (P?0.05). Conclusion The clinical efficacy of surgical options and endovascular are both significant. Embolization has lower incidence of complications, shorter hospital length and better prognosis, while the hospital expense is significantly higher than that of surgical options.