二级预防对化疗所致中性粒细胞减少症的临床意义
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

张友才,E-mail:zhangyoucai1989@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Clinical role of secondary prophylaxis in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨二级预防在化疗所致中性粒细胞减少症中的临床疗效、患者依从性及经济学评价。方法 选取2017年4月—2018年10月德阳市人民医院肿瘤科诊断明确的,并使用中等风险化疗方案,有二级预防指征的患者131例作为研究对象。基于对中性粒细胞减少症的处理方式,将患者分为两组:A组72例,给予二级预防,根据使用的药物进一步分为A1组(37例)和A2组(35例)。A1组使用重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(rhG-CSF)5?μg/kg皮下注射;A2组使用聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(PEG-rhG-CSF)6?mg皮下注射。B组59例,化疗规律检测血常规,当出现2~4度粒细胞减少时,给予rhG-CSF 5?μg/kg皮下 注射。比较A、B组患者能够按既定周期足剂量化疗的病例数、3、4度粒细胞减少人次、发热性中性粒细胞减少症人次、化疗周期天数、患者依从病例数、非化疗医疗费用等指标。结果 按周期足剂量化疗病例数:A组高于B组(P?<0.05);3、4度粒细胞减少人次:A组少于B组(P?<0.05);中性粒细胞减少症人次:A组少于B组(P?<0.05);化疗周期平均天数:A组少于B组(P?<0.05);依从率:A、B两组差异无统计学意义(P?>0.05);非化疗产生费用:A组费用高于B组(P?<0.05)。结论 规范的二级预防能够明显减少发生3、4度粒细胞减少和中性粒细胞减少症的人次,能够较好地保证患者按周期足剂量完成化疗。选用rhG-CSF还是PEG-rhG-CSF进行二级预防,需要考虑患者依从性和经济条件。

    Abstract:

    Objective To retrospectively observe the clinical efficacy, patient compliance and economic evaluation of secondary prophylaxis in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Methods From April 2017 to October 2018, 131 patients with indications for secondary prophylaxis were observed, who were diagnosed clearly and given a medium-risk chemotherapy in Oncology Department in the People’s Hospital of Deyang City. Based on the treatment of neutropenia, patients were divided into two groups. Secondary prevention was conducted in group A (72 patients). Patients were further divided into two sub-groups. Thirty-seven patients in sub-group A1 were injected subcutaneously with recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) at a dose of 5?μg/kg. Thirty-five patients in sub-group A2 were subcutaneously injected with pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF). Blood tests were performed regularly after chemotherapy in group B (59 patients). When grade 2 to 4 neutropenia occurred, rhG-CSF was injected subcutaneously at 5?μg/kg. A series of items were compared in these groups, such as the number of patients receiving full-dose of chemotherapy at established cycles, frequency of 3 to 4 degree neutropenia and febrile neutropenia, days of chemotherapy cycle, patient compliance, non-chemotherapeutic consumption and so on. Results Composition ratio of patients receiving full-dose of chemotherapy at established cycles: ratio of group A was higher than that of group B (P?< 0.05); Composition ratio of 3 to 4 degree neutropenia’s frequency: ratio of group A was lower than that of group B (P?< 0.05); Composition ratio of FN’s frequency: ratio of group A was less than that of group B (P??0.05); Non-chemotherapeutic consumption: consumption of group A was more than that of group B (P?

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

何迎盈,陈兆红,赵雷,张友才.二级预防对化疗所致中性粒细胞减少症的临床意义[J].中国现代医学杂志,2020,(13):84-89

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-07
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-07-15
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码