Ivor-lewis法治疗中段食管癌疗效
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and right chest-belly-neck three-incision for middle esophageal carcinoma
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨Ivor-lewis法与右胸-腹部-颈部三切口两种方式治疗中段食管癌的疗效。方法 回顾性分析该院于2009年9月-2012年9月收治的198例中段食管癌患者的临床资料进行分析,其中Ivor-lewis方式手术治疗患者130例,右胸三切口手术治疗患者68例。结果 Ivor-lewis方式治疗的130例患者与运用右胸三切口治疗的68例患者相比,手术时间、乳糜胸发生率、失血量和1及2年生存率差异无统计学意义,但术后住院时间、喉返神经损伤率及吻合口瘘差异均有统计学意义。结论 运用Ivor-lewis方式治疗中段食管癌较传统右胸-腹部-颈部三切口法有一定优势。

    Abstract:

    【Objective】 To compare the relevant information of Ivor-Lewis and right chest-belly-neck three-incision esophagectomy for middle esophageal carcinoma. 【Methods】 The data of 198 cases with middle esophageal carcinoma, who underwent esophagectomy in my hospital from Sep. 2009 to Sep. 2012, were retrospectively analyzed. The Ivor-Lewis group included 130 patients, while the right chest-belly-neck three-incision group had 68 patients. 【Results】 The differences in the operative time, chylothorax incidence and surgical blood loss, 1-year and 2-year survival rates were not statistically significant (P > 0.05); but the differences in the postoperative hospital stay, injury of recurrent nerve and anastomotic fistula were statistically significant between both groups (P < 0.05). 【Conclusions】 Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy has advantages in treatment of middle esophageal carcinoma, for example, few complications and rapid recovery. This method is worth to be applied in clinical practice.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

吴家远,李勇,芮玉峰,耿耿,张磊. Ivor-lewis法治疗中段食管癌疗效[J].中国现代医学杂志,2015,(33):88-90

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-27
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-11-20
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码