成人全身麻醉苏醒期躁动危险因素的Meta分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.重庆市人民医院 麻醉科,重庆 401120;2.重庆医科大学附属第二医院 麻醉科, 重庆 404000

作者简介:

通讯作者:

李晓霞,E-mail:300465@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn

中图分类号:

R614

基金项目:


A Meta-analysis of risk factors for emergence agitation in adults
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Department of Anesthesia, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing, 401120, China;2.Department of Anesthesia, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 404000, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 对成人全身麻醉苏醒期躁动的危险因素进行Meta分析。方法 检索中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、维普中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)、万方数据库、The Cochrane Library、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science,收集2010年1月—2020年1月公开发表的关于全身麻醉苏醒期躁动危险因素的文献,按照纳入与排除标准进行筛选,应用Review Manager 5.3软件对纳入文献进行Meta分析。结果 共纳入12篇文献,其中英文文献3篇,中文文献9篇;累计合并EA组1 520例,Non-EA组13 800例。Meta分析结果显示:男性[R=1.57(95% CI:1.17,2.10)]、ASA分级高[R=2.39(95% CI:1.80,3.17)]、有吸烟史[R=1.87(95% CI:1.23,2.84)]、有酗酒史[R=2.34(95% CI:1.79,3.05)]、合并糖尿病[R=1.63(95% CI:1.02,2.59)、手术时间长[R=22.78(95% CI:5.64,39.92)]、留置导尿管[R=8.27(95% CI:2.89,23.65)]、镇痛不足[R=6.26(95% CI:1.59,24.66)]、使用催醒药[R=1.85(95% CI:1.08,3.16)]、使用静吸复合麻醉[R=2.26(95% CI:1.34,3.82)]为成人全身麻醉苏醒期躁动的主要危险因素。结论 成人全身麻醉苏醒期躁动的主要危险因素为男性、ASA分级高、有吸烟及酗酒史、合并糖尿病、手术时间长、留置导尿管、镇痛不足、使用催醒药、使用静吸复合麻醉。在临床工作中,针对上述危险因素采取防治措施,可降低苏醒期躁动的发生率。

    Abstract:

    Objective To systematically assess the risk factors for emergence agitation in adults.Methods The published literatures concerning risk factors for emergence agitation from January 2010 to January 2020 were retrieved from China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP database, Wanfang database, CBM, The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, web of science. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, Review Manager 5.3 software was used for Meta analysis of the included literature.Results A total of 12 studies, contained 3 foreign and 7 domestic literatures, 1,520 case studies and 13,800 patients, were included. Meta-analysis showed that the major risk factors for emergence agitation in patients undergoing general anesthesia were males [R = 1.57, (95% CI: 1.17, 2.10)], ASA Class (III-IV) [R =2.39, (95% CI: 1.80, 3.17)], history of smoking [R = 1.87, (95% CI: 1.23, 2.84)], alcohol abuse [R = 2.34, (95% CI: 1.79, 3.05)], diabetes mellitus [R = 1.63, (95% CI: 1.02, 2.59)], long duration of surgery [R = 22.78, (95% CI: 5.64, 39.92)], post-operative urinary intubation [R = 8.27, (95% CI: 2.89, 23.65)], insufficient analgesia [R = 6.26, (95% CI: 1.59, 24.66)], use of stimulants [R = 1.85, (95% CI: 1.08, 3.16)], and intravenous-inhalation anesthesia [R = 2.26, (95% CI: 1.34, 3.82)].Conclusion Males, ASA Class (III-IV), history of smoking and alcohol abuse, diabetes mellitus, long duration of surgery, postoperative urinary intubation, insufficient analgesia, use of stimulants, and intravenous-inhalation anesthesia are independent risk factors for emergence agitation. In clinical practice, preventive measures should be taken to reduce the incidence of emergence agitation for patients with risk factors.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

周玲,李晓霞.成人全身麻醉苏醒期躁动危险因素的Meta分析[J].中国现代医学杂志,2021,(17):58-65

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-24
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-10-31
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码