经直肠超声结合剪切波弹性成像在直肠癌诊断及TNM分期中的应用
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

中国医科大学附属第四医院 消化内镜科,辽宁 沈阳 110032

作者简介:

通讯作者:

李诺,E-mail:doctor_linuo@163.com

中图分类号:

R735.37

基金项目:


Application of transrectal ultrasound combined with shear wave elastography in the diagnosis and TNM staging of rectal cancer
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110032, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 分析经直肠超声(TRUS)结合剪切波弹性成像(SWE)在直肠癌诊断及TNM分期中的应用。方法 回顾性分析2019年12月—2021年2月中国医科大学附属第四医院收治的86例直肠肿瘤患者临床资料。所有患者术前接受TRUS和SWE检查。记录TRUS与SWE及两者联合诊断直肠癌及其TNM分期的敏感性、特异性及准确率。比较直肠癌与直肠腺瘤患者肿瘤病灶处、周围脂肪和正常直肠壁3个位置Emax值和Emean值;绘制ROC曲线分析TRUS、SWE及联合诊断直肠癌的价值。结果 联合诊断直肠癌的敏感性为97.18%(95% CI:0.80,0.99),特异性为86.67%(95% CI:0.71,0.98),准确率为95.35%(95% CI:0.78,0.99)。ROC曲线分析结果显示,两者联合诊断直肠癌的AUC为0.968(95% CI:0.89,1.00)。两者联合诊断为T1期的准确率为94.12%(95% CI:0.76,0.94),T2期的准确率为90.91%(95% CI:0.72,0.92),T3期的准确率为100.00%(95% CI:0.99,1.00),T4期的准确率为100.00%(95% CI:0.99,1.00)。直肠癌组Emax、Emean值较非直肠癌组高(P <0.05)。不同分期的杨氏模量值比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05),且TNM分期越晚,Emax、Emean值越高。结论 TRUS结合SWE诊断直肠癌及TNM分期的准确性较高,可为临床病变鉴别及病理程度提供一定参考依据。

    Abstract:

    Objective To analyze the efficacy of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) combined with shear wave elastography (SWE) in the diagnosis and TNM staging of rectal cancer.Methods The clinical data of 86 patients with rectal tumor admitted to our hospital from December 2019 to February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent TRUS and SWE before operation. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of TRUS, SWE and their combination in the diagnosis and staging of rectal cancer were recorded. Emax and Emean values of tumor foci, surrounding fat tissues, and normal rectal wall were compared between patients with rectal cancer and rectal adenoma. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were applied to analyze the values of TRUS, SWE and their combination in the diagnosis of rectal cancer.Results The diagnostic sensitivity of TRUS combined with SWE was 97.18% (95% CI: 79.7%, 98.9%), with the specificity of 86.67% (95% CI: 71.0%, 97.8%) and the accuracy of 95.35% (95% CI: 78.2%, 98.5%). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of TRUS combined with SWE for diagnosing rectal cancer was 0.968 (95% CI: 0.894, 1.000). The sensitivity of TRUS combined with SWE for diagnosing stage T1, T2, T3 and T4 rectal cancer was 94.12% (95% CI: 75.5%, 94.0%), 90.91% (95% CI: 71.8%, 91.8%), 100.00% (95% CI: 99.2%, 100.00%), 100.00% (95% CI: 99.0%, 100.0%), respectively. The Emax and Emean values in the rectal cancer group were higher than those in non-rectal cancer group (P < 0.05). Besides, Emax and Emean values were significantly different among the stages (P < 0.05), and the more advanced the T stage, the higher the Emax and Emean values.Conclusions TRUS combined with SWE is more accurate in diagnosing and staging rectal cancer, which can provide certain reference basis for clinical identification of the lesions and determination of their pathological degrees.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张珊珊,李诺,刘露,张绅.经直肠超声结合剪切波弹性成像在直肠癌诊断及TNM分期中的应用[J].中国现代医学杂志,2021,(14):20-24

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-09
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-10-31
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码