川平法联合肌电生物反馈对偏瘫后手功能恢复的疗效分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.齐齐哈尔医学院附属第二医院 康复医学科, 黑龙江 齐齐哈尔 161006;2.黑龙江中医药大学 药物安全性评价中心, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150040

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R743.3

基金项目:

黑龙江省卫生健康委科研课题(No:20212020010020)


Therapeutic effect of repetitive facilitative exercise combined with EMG biofeedback on hand function in patients with hemiplegia
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical College, Qiqihar, Heilongjiang 161006, China;2.Drug Safety Evaluation Center, Heilongjiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150040, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨川平法联合肌电生物反馈对偏瘫后手功能恢复的疗效。方法 选取2021年5月—2021年12月齐齐哈尔医学院附属第二医院康复医学科就诊的90例偏瘫患者,采用随机数字表法将其分为川平组、肌电组及联合组,每组30例。所有偏瘫患者均常规给予上肢、手部作业治疗和针灸治疗。在此基础上,川平组采用川平法对患者手部进行治疗;肌电组采用肌电生物反馈对患者手部进行治疗;联合组采用川平法联合肌电生物反馈治疗。治疗2个月后,比较3组患者的Fugl-Meyer运动功能评定量表手指功能评分、偏瘫手功能分级及腕背伸肌最大收缩时肌电信号(EMG)界限值。结果 3组患者治疗2个月后与治疗前手指功能评分差值比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05),联合组高于川平组、肌电组(P <0.05),川平组与肌电组比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。治疗2个月后,3组患者偏瘫手功能分级比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05),联合组Ⅰ~Ⅲ级人数少于川平组、肌电组(P <0.05);Ⅳ~Ⅵ级人数多于川平组、肌电组(P <0.05),川平组与肌电组比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。3组患者治疗2个月后与治疗前腕背伸肌最大收缩时EMG界限值的差值比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05),联合组高于川平组、肌电组(P <0.05),川平组与肌电组比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论 川平法联合肌电生物反馈可能通过诱发肌肉收缩、强化肌肉力量等方面促进偏瘫患者手功能恢复。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the therapeutic effect of repetitive facilitative exercise combined with EMG biofeedback on hand function in patients with hemiplegia and analyze its mechanism.Methods Ninety patients with hemiplegia were selected from the Department of rehabilitation medicine of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical College from May to December 2021, they were randomly divided into repetitive facilitative exercise group, EMG group, and combined group, with 30 people in each group. On this basis, repetitive facilitative exercise group was treated with repetitive facilitative exercise, EMG group was treated with EMG biofeedback, and the combined group was treated with repetitive facilitative exercise combined with EMG biofeedback. After 2 months of treatment, the Fugl‐Meyer motor function scale Ⅷ hand motor part score, hemiplegic hand function grade and maximum EMG limit value were compared among the three groups.Results Fugl-meyer finger function score difference between the three groups after 2 months of treatment and before treatment was statistically significant (P < 0.05), among which the combined group was higher than the Chuanping group and EMG group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between chuanping group and EMG group (P > 0.05). After 2 months of treatment, there was statistically significant difference in the hand function grade of hemiplegic patients in the three groups (P < 0.05), and the combined group was superior to chuanping group and EMG group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between chuanping group and EMG group (P > 0.05). After 2 months of treatment and before treatment, the EMG difference between the three groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05), and the combined group was higher than chuanping group and EMG group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between chuanping group and EMG group (P > 0.05).Conclusion Repetitive facilitative exercise combined with EMG biofeedback may promote the recovery of hand function in patients with hemiplegia by inducing muscle contraction and strengthening muscle strength.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

柴德君,胡斌,房城,庞志娟,周志霞.川平法联合肌电生物反馈对偏瘫后手功能恢复的疗效分析[J].中国现代医学杂志,2022,(17):88-92

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-03
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-10-24
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码