2型糖尿病不同年龄组内脏脂肪面积的相关性分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

广州中医药大学深圳医院(福田) 内分泌科,广东 深圳 518000

作者简介:

通讯作者:

朴春丽,E-mail:pcl2013@sina.cn;Tel:18819075590

中图分类号:

R587.1

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目(No:82374380)


Correlation analysis of visceral fat area in different age groups of type 2 diabetes
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Endocrinology, Shenzhen Hospital (Futian) of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518000, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 分析2型糖尿病患者不同年龄组内脏脂肪面积(VFA)与体质量指数(BMI)、腰围(WC)、臀围(HC)、血糖、血脂、尿酸等代谢指标的相关性。方法 纳入2019年2月—2024年9月广州中医药大学深圳医院(福田)2 175例2型糖尿病患者,对其临床资料进行统计分析。按年龄分为4组:A组(<40岁),B组(40~<50岁),C组(50~<65岁),D组(≥65岁)。分析不同年龄组患者的VFA、皮下脂肪面积(SFA),BMI、WC、HC、空腹血糖(FBG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、甘油三酯(TG)、总胆固醇(TC),低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、尿酸(UA)等指标水平的差异。采用Pearson法分析不同年龄组的VFA与SFA、BMI、WC、HC、FBG、HbA1c、TG、TC、LDL-C、HDL-C、UA等指标的相关性。结果 共纳入的2 175例糖尿病患者中,1 327例男性(61.0%),848例女性(39.0%),平均年龄(53.20±10.62)岁;A组262例,B组425例,C组1 178例,D组310例。男性的BMI、WC、HC、VFA、FBG、HbA1c、TG、ALT均高于女性(P <0.05),年龄、TC、LDL-C、AST均低于女性(P <0.05)。不同年龄组患者中,越年轻患者的BMI、WC、HC、VFA、SFA、UA、HbA1c、ALT、TG、LDL-C、HDL-C水平越高(P <0.05)。相关性分析结果显示,VFA与BMI、WC、HC、SFA、UA、FBG和TG均呈正相关(r =0.4360.7280.5880.6860.2890.189和0.143,均P <0.05),与HDL呈负相关(r =-0.165,P <0.05)。在年龄组分析中,A组:VFA与BMI、WC、HC、SFA、UA、FBG均呈正相关(r =0.2960.7990.7060.7080.260和0.184,均P <0.05),与HbA1c、TC、LDL-C、HDL-C均呈负相关(r =-0.147、-0.003、-0.005和-0.123,均P <0.05);B组:VFA与BMI、WC、HC、SFA、UA、FBG和TG均呈正相关(r =0.7560.7670.6640.7500.3070.226和0.143,均P <0.05),与HDL-C呈负相关(r =-0.161,P =0.000);C组:VFA与BMI、WC、HC、SFA、UA、FBG和TG均呈正相关(r =0.6930.6960.5370.6630.2560.179和0.140,均P <0.05),与HDL-C呈负相关(r =-0.161,P <0.05);D组:VFA与其BMI、WC、HC、SFA、UA、FBG均呈正相关(r =0.6030.6330.4110.6020.304和0.166,均P <0.05),与HDL-C呈负相关(r =-0.152,P <0.05)。结论 2型糖尿病的发病人群主要集中在中老年阶段,BMI、WC、HC、SFA、TG、UA是影响VFA的主要危险因素,在中青年群体中,BMI、TG、UA对中青年糖尿病患者的影响重大,需要加强对中青年群体患者管理力度。

    Abstract:

    Objective To analyze the correlation between visceral fat area (VFA) and metabolic indicators such as body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, hip circumference, and glucose-lipid acid in different age groups of patients with type 2 diabetes, by organizing the database of the National Standardized Metabolic Disease Management Center (MMC) at a tertiary hospital in Shenzhen.Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study based on the MMC center, performing statistical analysis on the relevant data of 2 175 enrolled diabetes patients, categorized into four age groups: A ( <40 years), B ( 40≤ age <50 years), C( 50≤ age <65 years), D( ≥65 years).Analyze the differences in VFA, SFA, BMI, WC, HC, FBG, HbA1c, TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, and UA levels among different age groups. The Pearson method was used to analyze the correlation between VFA and SFA, BMI, WC, HC, FBG, HbA1c, TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, UA, and other indicators in different age groups.Results This study included 2 175 participants, comprising 1 327 males (61.3%) and 848 females (38.7%), with an average age of (53.20 ± 10.62)years. Group A has 262 participants, Group B has 425 participants, Group C has 1 178 participants, and Group D has 310 participants.In the male group, BMI, WC, HC, VFA, FBG, HbA1c, and TG were higher than those in the female group, while age, TC, LDL-C, and AST were lower than in the female group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Among patients in different age groups, younger age was associated with higher levels of BMI, WC, HC, VFA, SFA, UA, HbA1c, ALT, and LDL-C, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).Correlation analysis showed that VFA levels were positively correlated with BMI (r =0.436, P = 0.000), WC (r = 0.728, P = 0.000), HC (r = 0.588, P = 0.000), SFA (r = 0.686, P =0.000), UA (r = 0.289, P = 0.000), FBG (r = 0.189, P =0.000), and TG r = 0.143, P =0.000), and negatively correlated with HDL (r = -0.165, P = 0.000). In the age subgroup analysis, in Group A, VFA was positively correlated with BMI (r = 0.296, P = 0.000), WC (r = 0.799, P = 0.000), HC (r = 0.706, P =0.000), SFA (r = 0.708, P =0.000), UA (r = 0.260, P = 0.000), and FBG (r = 0.184, P = 0.003), and negatively correlated with HbA1c (r = -0.147, P= 0.018), TC (r = -0.003, P = 0.042, LDL-C (r = -0.005, P = 0.023), and HDL-C (r = -0.123, P =0.048); in Group B, VFA was positively correlated with BMI (r = 0.756, P = 0.000), WC (r = 0.767, P = 0.000), HC (r = 0.664, P = 0.000), SFA (r = 0.750, P = 0.000), UA (r = 0.307, P = 0.000), FBG (r =0.226, P =0.000), and TG (r =0.143, P = 0.003), and negatively correlated with HDL-C (r = -0.161, P = 0.000); in Group C, VFA was positively correlated with BMI (r = 0.693, P = 0.000), WC (r = 0.696, P = 0.000), HC (r = 0.537, P = 0.000), SFA (r = 0.663, P = 0.000), UA (r = 0.256, P = 0.000), FBG (r = 0.179, P = 0.000), and TG (r = 0.140, P = 0.000), and negatively correlated with HDL-C (r = -0.161, P = 0.000); in Group D, VFA was positively correlated with BMI (r = 0.603, P = 0.000), WC (r = 0.633, P = 0.000), HC (r = 0.411, P = 0.000), SFA (r = 0.602, P = 0.000), UA (r = 0.304, P = 0.000), and FBG (r = 0.166, P = 0.003), and negatively correlated with HDL-C (r = -0.152, P = 0.007). The overall research results indicated that in the diabetic population, BMI, WC, HC, SFA, UA, FBG, and TG were positively correlated with VFA, while HDL-L was negatively correlated. However, HbA1c, TC, and LDL-C did not show significant correlations with VFA. Further age-stratified analysis revealed that as age increased, the correlation between BMI and VFA became increasingly significant, while the correlations between WC and HC weakened.Conclusion The type 2 diabetes mainly occurs in the middle-aged and elderly population. BMI, WC, HC, SFA, TG, and UA are the primary risk factors affecting VFA. In the young and middle-aged group, BMI, TG, and UA have a significant impact on diabetes patients, necessitating strengthened management efforts for this demographic.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

赵晓华,朴春丽.2型糖尿病不同年龄组内脏脂肪面积的相关性分析[J].中国现代医学杂志,2025,35(7):71-77

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-06
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-04-18
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码